Pre-conference: Demystifying causal inference and mediation methods for public health researchers
Wednesday 20 November, 09:00 - 17:00, Room Riou
Organised by:
EUPHA Research Pillar and EUPHA Section on Public health epidemiology
Background
Mediation analysis is a common tool in public health researchers’ toolboxes, helping us to understand processes or casual mechanisms through which one factor affects another and to identify pathways where intervention might be most fruitful (particularly useful when the exposure of interest is less amenable to change). The so-called ‘Baron and Kenny’ approach to mediation is very widely used in public health research but makes a number of assumptions that can rarely be met. This can produce biased findings, potentially leading to flawed conclusions. Causal mediation methods can change or avoid the need for some of these assumptions, although they remain relatively inaccessible to those most likely to want to apply them.
Aims
In this workshop we will provide public health practitioners and researchers with an overview of the limitations of the ‘Baron and Kenny’ approach to mediation, including when and why this method fails to work. We will present alternative approaches in a way that is more accessible than in the methodological literature, drawing on applied research questions to show when different methods might be most appropriately used. During the session participants will learn the differences between direct and indirect effects, and between controlled and natural direct effects. They will work in small groups to draw Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) to consolidate the learning. There will be a series of practical examples of the application of mediation analysis in public health using a variety of methods. Workshop participants should come with research questions in their mind relating to issues of mediation in their own research areas. Throughout the day there will be opportunities to ask questions, and the final session is designed to resolve any remaining issues that have arisen during the day.
Track record
Presenters John Lynch (Australia) and Anna Pearce (United Kingdom), both public health researchers, have a track record in applying these methods in their own work and teaching them to others. Chairs, Alastair Leyland and Linsay Gray, are statisticians working in public health with extensive experience in applying and teaching advanced statistical methods to mixed levels and disciplines. The course material has been successfully presented to a range of audiences, in one-off workshops to public health researchers and social scientists at the University of Glasgow and to epidemiologists and public health doctors at the UCL Institute of Child Health. It has also been run numerous times as part of a successful causal inference course in Australia.
Programme
Morning chair: Alastair Leyland, EUPHA Research Pillar, United Kingdom |
||
9.00 – 9.05 |
Introduction to the workshop |
|
9.05 – 9.45 |
Introduction to mediation analysis and DAGs |
|
9.45 – 10.30 |
Small group exercise: drawing a DAG |
|
10.30 - 10.45 |
Feedback on small group exercise |
|
10.45 - 11:15 |
Coffee Break |
|
11.15 - 12.00 |
Causal inference and mediation in a potential outcomes world |
|
12.00 - 12.45 |
Those annoying intermediates |
|
12.45 – 13.45 |
Networking lunch |
|
Afternoon chair: Linsay Gray, EUPHA Section on Public Health Epidemiology, United Kingdom |
||
13.45 – 14.00 |
Recap of morning session, including questions |
|
14.00 – 14.50 |
Applications of mediation analysis (3 x 20 min time slots) 1. Are certain racial groups really at greater risk of type 2 diabetes? A mediation analysis of income inequality and diabetes incidence in the United States |
|
14.50 – 15.00 |
Further questions to all speakers |
|
15.00 – 15.30 |
Coffee Break |
|
15.30 – 16.30 |
Applications of mediation analysis (2 x 20 min time slots) 1. Mechanisms of life-course socioeconomic inequalities in adult systemic inflammation: findings from two cohort studies |
|
16:30 – 16:45 |
Q&A to all speakers |
|
16.30 – 17.00 |
Closing Q&A and wrapping up |
|
Rationale
Mediation analysis is a common tool in public health researchers’ toolboxes, helping us to understand processes or casual mechanisms through which one factor affects another and to identify pathways where intervention might be most fruitful (particularly useful when the exposure of interest is less amenable to change). The so-called ‘Baron and Kenny’ approach to mediation is very widely used in public health research but makes a number of assumptions that might not always be met. This can produce biased findings, potentially leading to flawed conclusions. Causal mediation methods can overcome or reduce some of these assumptions, although they remain relatively inaccessible to those most likely to apply them.
Learning objectives
In this workshop we will provide public health practitioners and researchers with an overview of the limitations of traditional regression approaches to mediation, including when and why this method may produce biased estimates. We will present alternative approaches in a way that is more accessible than in the methodological literature, drawing on applied research questions to show when different methods might be most appropriately used. During the session participants will learn the differences between direct and indirect effects, and between controlled and natural direct effects. They will work in small groups to draw Directed Acyclic Graphs to consolidate the learning. There will be a series of practical examples of the application of mediation analysis in public health using a variety of methods. Workshop participants should come with research questions in their mind relating to issues of mediation in their own research areas. Throughout the day there will be opportunities to ask questions, and the final session is designed to resolve any final issues that arise during the day.
Track record
Presenters Lynch and Pearce, both public health researchers, have a track record in applying these methods in their own work and teaching them to others. Chairs, Leyland and Gray, are statisticians with extensive experience in teaching advanced statistical methods to mixed levels and disciplines. This material has been successfully presented to a range of audiences, in one-off workshops to public health researchers and social scientists at the University of Glasgow and to epidemiologists and public health doctors at the UCL Institute of Child Health. It has also been run numerous times as part of a causal inference course in Australia.
Biographies
John Lynch, Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Adelaide
John Lynch is Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health at the University of Adelaide, South Australia. He is a Visiting Professor of Epidemiology in the Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences at the University of Bristol in the UK. He spent 20 years working in North America and before returning to Australia in 2009 he held professorial positions at the University of Michigan in the USA, and at McGill University in Canada. |
Anna Pearce, Research Fellow, University of Glasgow
Dr Anna Pearce is a Wellcome Trust Research Fellow at the MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow. She has fifteen years of experience researching socio-economic inequalities in child health, with a focus on analysing secondary data to understand the pathways through which inequalities in children’s health emerge and options for their reduction. Once a user of ‘Baron and Kenny’, Anna has spent the past five years developing an appreciation of advanced mediation methods and applying them in her own research. As a social epidemiologist with limited formal statistical training, she enjoys the experience of sharing with other researchers the exciting opportunities that advanced mediation methods offer in accessible way. She is an Honorary Lecturer at the UCL Institute of Child Health, an Associate Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, and Honorary Treasurer of the Society of Social Medicine and Population Health. She was previously Associate Statistical Editor for the Journal of Child Health Care. She has received >£1,000,000 funding, including in personal awards from the Wellcome Trust and UK Medical Research Council, and for the application of causal mediation methods for understanding health inequalities. |
Registration fee
The registration fee is € 140 which includes networking lunch and refreshments.